QUICK START:PatternsErrors & FixesSecurityBenchmarksDevOps RecipesCheatsheetsInterviewCompareTopicsHTMLCSSJavaScriptTypeScriptPythonSQLReactNext.jsNode.jsLinux & UbuntuKotlinSwiftC# / .NETJavaGoRustC++DSASystem DesignDevOpsCybersecurityAI / ML
Databases & Storage

OLAP Analytics: ClickHouse vs DuckDB vs PostgreSQL

Benchmarking analytical OLAP queries on 1 Billion records comparing columnar databases ClickHouse and DuckDB against PostgreSQL.

Test Environment

CPUAWS i4i.8xlarge
RAM256GB
OSUbuntu 22.04 LTS
ToolTPC-H

Metrics Comparison

Complex Aggregation Time

Unit: Seconds
ClickHouse
0.8
DuckDB
1.2
PostgreSQL
145.0

Detailed Analysis

Columnar datastores like ClickHouse and DuckDB execute analytical queries 100x faster than traditional row-oriented PostgreSQL.

Columnar storage only reads necessary columns from disk and vectorizes execution, drastically reducing I/O and CPU time for aggregations.

Disk Read

Fetching data into memory

Bottleneck: Row-stores fetch entire rows even when computing a single column sum.

Architectural Recommendations

  • Use DuckDB for embedded local analytics
  • Use ClickHouse for distributed real-time analytics

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I use Postgres for OLAP?

Yes, but for massive datasets, you need columnar extensions like Citus or specialized tools.